“Why should
we invest in Defense, we’ve been living in peace for over 50 years!” or “Why
invest our precious money in Defense when we’re dealing with a recession!” are
phrases I’ve heard over the last few years. When I received the assignment to
write a statement following the question “How much money should a nation spend
on defense?” I began to think. Do the first two phrases have a point? At first
sight, certainly. Though by forming my thesis statement I began to see how both
phrases missed some vital points.
Let me
propose the following statement: The
amount of money spend on defense, should be a shared investment between allies,
and depend on threat level predictions made by a) several independent experts
or b) a team of experts, and an independent third party.
Not
investing in defense, see the first phrase in the introduction, is out of the
question. ‘We’ve been living in peace for over 50 years’ overlooks the reason why we’re living in peace. After WW2, nations flocked together to form unions, e.g.
OCSE, NATO, EU, UN etc. These unions exist to protect the safety of all
participating countries. Multiple countries together are stronger than a
country on its own. A country on its own will have to spend significantly more
money than countries fighting together. However, still every participating country
has to pay its contribution to the union. This means that the Netherlands will have
to invest as well.
Sometimes
spending money on defense seems like a waste of money. Dutch soldiers are
deployed in countries most Dutch people have never been to e.g. Bosnia (SFOR),
Afghanistan (ISAF), Somalia (EUNAVFOR) or
even Mali (MINUSMA). Though, there clearly is a reason for these deployments. The
mission in Somalia for example protects international trade, which is a major
source of income for the Netherlands. Establishing a new government in
Afghanistan, will benefit our future wellbeing by proxy. The more stable and
likeminded the world becomes, the better it will be for our future. As long as
our world is divided and unstable, we’re not safe.
Determining
a national budget though is not an easy matter. I propose that there should be an
international cooperation between experts who evaluate threat levels on an
ongoing basis. These experts should be able to predict what is necessary to
protect our nation and other nations involved. Together it should be decided
how much should be spend on defense. To prevent corruption, decisions should be
reviewed by an independent third party. Since our world is not safe and defense
is vital, the annual budget should be independent of National income, and even
during times of financial crisis, sufficient investments need to be made.
My essay contains logos because:
ReplyDelete- I debunk counter arguments to my thesis.
- I provide reasons why contributing to the defense budget is an investment into a safe worldMy essay contains pathos because:
- I link investing in defense to ‘investing in a better world’.
My essay contains ethos because:
- We need to pay our contribution to the international community that keeps us safe. It’s our duty, and we have a shared responsibility to create a likeminded world and protect ourselves against threats.